Okay, readers, it's time to finally finish up reviewing The Hunger Games Series. This week, I bring you Mockingjay. Warning: this entire post is probably spoilers.
THE BASICS:
Mockingjay, released in 2010, is the third and final installment of Suzanne Collins' young adult triology, The Hunger Games. It picks up almost immediately where Catching Fire left off.
After learning that her home, District 12, has been destroyed, Katniss is taken to the mysterious District 13 where she is convinced to become "The Mockingjay," or basically the symbol of the new revolution. Being a student of literature (God, that sounded pretentious. It doesn't help that I'm writing this in a Starbucks, either...) becoming the "symbol" of anything is rarely ever good. Look at Gatsby from The Great Gatsby. Jack from Lord of the Flies. Kurtz from Heart of Darkness. Did anything end well for any of these characters? If you don't know CRACK A BOOK FOR ONCE IN YOUR LIFE.
Anyway, Katniss reluctantly agrees to become the Mockingjay, mostly at the behest of her best friend/pseudo love interest, Gale. Gale, by the way, has become like that guy you knew in high school or college who was angry about everything the government did and constantly quoted Orwell. I have a theory that if Gale lived in today's America, he'd be one of those guys that believes Ron Paul will fix everything about America despite the fact he is pretty loony (cue a thousand emails from a thousand stoned, angry teens-and-twentysomethings telling me how wrong I am).
I digress. Anyway, in this book, we also see Peeta, everyone's favorite good guy, go completely insane. Seriously. He's been brainwashed by The Capitol and attempt to kill Katniss on more than one occasion. He also yells some pretty terrible things at her at some point. But nothing too terrible because this is a young adult book after all.
The entire book is pretty much Katniss and her crew engaging in urban warfare of some sort of another. And while this is cool, after a while I found myself struggling to finish. Out of the three books, this one was definitely my least favorite. I felt like all the fighting, despite the fact it's near constant action, does little to actually move the plot forward. However, I was satisfied by the end of the book, and I have no complaints about the way the series was resolved.
Which is rare. Like just about everyone else on the planet, I read the Harry Potter series. Multiple times. And my mother, who is a very smart lady, pointed something out to me. JK Rowling kills off everyone you love. Seriously. Few characters were spared. And in a sense I can understand that. She wanted to hit us right in the gut so we'd feel the utter devastation Voldemort caused. I get that, but that doesn't mean it doesn't suck. Rowling killed off everyone from pretty major characters to characters you didn't even know you liked until they were gone. By the end of Deathly Hallows I found myself wondering if all these deaths were really necessary or if she was just picking characters because you knew their names.
This is something Collins doesn't really do. Yes, there are deaths in the trilogy. And they are deaths you wish didn't happen. I would say that the handful of deaths that occur in The Hunger Games hit you harder than the armies of people that die in Harry Potter. Or at least they did for me. I'm going to bring up Fred Weasley's death here. Rowling has said herself in interviews that she really didn't know why Fred would be the one to die. But he does. And we cry because this is Fred Weasley. We grew up with this guy making us laugh. And now he's gone, and so are our childhoods.
But I was completely devastated when Prim died. This is one of the few books I've read as an adult that has drawn actual tears from me. I really love how this book treats the relationship between Katniss and Prim, and how in the end, even though Katniss has done literally everything she could to save her, she can't. Maybe it's because I'm very close to my own sister and would do everything Katniss did for Prim without giving it a second thought, but you can really see how this breaks Katniss by the end of the book. Katniss never fought against The Capitol. Every action Katniss has taken has been to keep Prim safe. Katniss did everything she possibly could, and in a cruel, twisted accident (and it's implied Gale was responsible for it, though he denies it) Prim is still taken from her. And that lack of reason, that suddenness, is what makes it truly tragic.
I also think that in Mockingjay is the only time the readers really see Katniss's romantic conflict in choosing one boy over the other. Now that Peeta hates her and she isn't having to put on a show to save her own life (and the lives of everyone she loves) she can really explore her feelings more deeply. And it isn't without conflict. It's implied throughout the entire series that Katniss has always had some sort of feelings for Gale. He's really sort of her first crush. And he is like her in many ways-- they both grew up in The Seam and have a level of understanding that most other couples can only dream of. But that's the thing. Katniss and Gale are too similar. Katniss even admits that she and Gale "have the same fire." Also he is kind of responsible for the death of her sister. Which is a giant buzzkill.
We learn that Katniss falling in love with Peeta was "inevitable." He's always symbolized the hope for a better future. He's been the good in everyone. And he eventually recovers from his brainwashing. And while Gale probably understands what Katniss grew up in, Peeta is the only one who can ever really understand who Katniss has become. The Games change you, and not always in a good way. Look at Haymitch. Katniss has always managed to find everything she needs to survive. She's one of the most self-reliant, independent heroines I've ever read about. The only thing she's never had is hope. And that's what Peeta gives her.
Also, am I the only one who loved the little exchange between Katniss and Peeta at the end of the book before the epilogue? There was something so innocent about it. It reminded me of something I would have read in one of the books in Madeline L'engle's "Austins" series. Very cute.
So now that I've ruined multiple book series for you, dear reader, let me just say some final things.
CLOSING REMARKS:
When I come to the end of a book series, I sometimes delay finishing it. Like I'm not going to know what to do with myself after. And sometimes because I'm afraid I'm going to hate the way it ends. Even though Mockingjay moved incredibly slowly sometimes, I am really satisfied with the way Collins ended the series. It felt firmly and absolutely resolved. Especially coming from a woman who ended practically every chapter of every book with a friggin' cliffhanger. Yes, the epilogue goes to ruin that a little bit, but I have a tendency to take epilogues with a grain of salt. Don't believe me? Go read Crime and Punishment. Go on. I'll wait.
OVERALL:
Three and a half, maybe four, out of five.
Ms. Gardzalla Goes to Washington
A blog about law school, love, and life in Washington, DC.
Wednesday, May 30, 2012
Tuesday, May 29, 2012
Back in the District Again
So after what will probably come to be known as the most disastrous trip back to DC in history, I'm finally here again, if temporarily. I'm here in Saxby's Coffee, feeling a little bit like a pretentious douche for writing in a coffeeshop. Perhaps I overanalyze.
On this venture to DC, I'll be meeting my roommates (HI ROOMMATES!) and hopefully getting a job. Prepare to see a post on here eventually about the soul-crushing state of unemployment. The market is pretty dismal for millennials right now, but I'm not letting that stop me.
On this venture to DC, I'll be meeting my roommates (HI ROOMMATES!) and hopefully getting a job. Prepare to see a post on here eventually about the soul-crushing state of unemployment. The market is pretty dismal for millennials right now, but I'm not letting that stop me.
Wednesday, May 16, 2012
Ms. Gardzalla reviews a book, pt. 2
A while back, I had a discussion with a friend of mine about why second books in trilogies always seem to be the best. Characters are well developed, so there's more room for plot. The action builds the entire way through. No rush towards a happy ending. Catching Fire fits this model perfectly.
WARNING: THIS POST IS FULL OF SPOILERS.
BASICS:
Catching Fire is the 2009 sequel to the 2008 young adult novel The Hunger Games. It takes place almost immediately after the first book, with Katniss and Peeta embarking on a victory tour after winning the 74th Hunger Games.
Katniss and Peeta haven't really spoken since the victory, since Peeta has found out that Katniss exaggerated her feelings towards him for the show of things. You know, so they wouldn't die. Katniss is struggling to understand her feelings not only towards Peeta, but towards Gale, with whom she has shared a kiss with at this point. But in the post-apocalyptic, futuristic nation of Panem, Katniss has little time for typical, self-indulgent, teenage dillydallying. She has several asses (including her own) to save.
The 75th Hunger Games is special. It's what's known in the book as a "Quarter Quell," meaning the fabulously sadistic gamemakers decide to really rip the rug out from under everyone. The past two Quarter Quells have involved such horrors as twice the number of tributes and I don't even remember what the other one was, but I'm sure it was equally cruel.
This Quarter Quell, tributes are reaped from past victors. Being the only female victor from District 12, Katniss is lucky enough to go back. Peeta volunteers for Haymitch. One of the things I enjoyed about this book is Katniss realizing the importance of interdependence. At least since her father died, Katniss has been pretty much self-reliant. It isn't easy for her to accept help from anyone. It doesn't even really dawn on her in the first book how much Peeta is helping her. Now she literally has an entire country on her side.
Anyway, I'm not going to give the entire plot away this time. Mostly because the plot of this one is really good, and I don't want to ruin it for anyone who hasn't read it yet. And if you haven't, you should get on that immediately.
I really only have a few complaints about this book. Collins seems to backtrack a lot and go back over stuff she already covered in the first book (like what muttations are), and that slows the action down A LOT. I also hate how the other tributes are kind of glossed over, but I understand that Collins probably had to do this for the sake of moving the story forward. She continues with her "ending every chapter on a cliffhanger" angle, and AUGH THE ENDING OF THIS ONE. Very Empire Strikes back.
I mentioned in my last review that one of the things I like most about Katniss as a protagonist is the fact she doesn't get wrapped up in that romantic triangle crap that made Twilight so popular. Her self-esteem isn't wrapped up in Peeta's feelings for her, nor Gale's, and while she is obviously conflicted about the two, it doesn't run the story by any means. In fact, there are many scenes where she seems downright annoyed that two very attractive men are vying for her affections. Refreshing.
I sped through Catching Fire, unable to get enough and hungry to find out what would happen next. The last page will leave you ready for Mockingjay.
OVERALL:
Four and a half.
WARNING: THIS POST IS FULL OF SPOILERS.
BASICS:
Catching Fire is the 2009 sequel to the 2008 young adult novel The Hunger Games. It takes place almost immediately after the first book, with Katniss and Peeta embarking on a victory tour after winning the 74th Hunger Games.
Katniss and Peeta haven't really spoken since the victory, since Peeta has found out that Katniss exaggerated her feelings towards him for the show of things. You know, so they wouldn't die. Katniss is struggling to understand her feelings not only towards Peeta, but towards Gale, with whom she has shared a kiss with at this point. But in the post-apocalyptic, futuristic nation of Panem, Katniss has little time for typical, self-indulgent, teenage dillydallying. She has several asses (including her own) to save.
The 75th Hunger Games is special. It's what's known in the book as a "Quarter Quell," meaning the fabulously sadistic gamemakers decide to really rip the rug out from under everyone. The past two Quarter Quells have involved such horrors as twice the number of tributes and I don't even remember what the other one was, but I'm sure it was equally cruel.
This Quarter Quell, tributes are reaped from past victors. Being the only female victor from District 12, Katniss is lucky enough to go back. Peeta volunteers for Haymitch. One of the things I enjoyed about this book is Katniss realizing the importance of interdependence. At least since her father died, Katniss has been pretty much self-reliant. It isn't easy for her to accept help from anyone. It doesn't even really dawn on her in the first book how much Peeta is helping her. Now she literally has an entire country on her side.
Anyway, I'm not going to give the entire plot away this time. Mostly because the plot of this one is really good, and I don't want to ruin it for anyone who hasn't read it yet. And if you haven't, you should get on that immediately.
I really only have a few complaints about this book. Collins seems to backtrack a lot and go back over stuff she already covered in the first book (like what muttations are), and that slows the action down A LOT. I also hate how the other tributes are kind of glossed over, but I understand that Collins probably had to do this for the sake of moving the story forward. She continues with her "ending every chapter on a cliffhanger" angle, and AUGH THE ENDING OF THIS ONE. Very Empire Strikes back.
I mentioned in my last review that one of the things I like most about Katniss as a protagonist is the fact she doesn't get wrapped up in that romantic triangle crap that made Twilight so popular. Her self-esteem isn't wrapped up in Peeta's feelings for her, nor Gale's, and while she is obviously conflicted about the two, it doesn't run the story by any means. In fact, there are many scenes where she seems downright annoyed that two very attractive men are vying for her affections. Refreshing.
I sped through Catching Fire, unable to get enough and hungry to find out what would happen next. The last page will leave you ready for Mockingjay.
OVERALL:
Four and a half.
Tuesday, May 8, 2012
Amendment One in NC
As many of you may know, I have lived in North Carolina for most of my life. I have not, in technical terms "liked" most of it. Not until I moved to Boone, anyway. I was hesitant to write anything about Amendment One. I was pretty sure it wasn't going to pass. I don't think I knew of a single person who was voting for it.
All I want to say now is "damn."
There is a lot that I could say about Amendment One, but it's all pretty much already been said. For those of you that don't know, Amendment One was an amendment to the North Carolina constitution that not only defined marriage as being between one man and one woman, but also banned any other sort of domestic partnerships. Same-sex marriage is already illegal in NC, by the way.
In the words of the proposed amendment:
All I want to say now is "damn."
There is a lot that I could say about Amendment One, but it's all pretty much already been said. For those of you that don't know, Amendment One was an amendment to the North Carolina constitution that not only defined marriage as being between one man and one woman, but also banned any other sort of domestic partnerships. Same-sex marriage is already illegal in NC, by the way.
In the words of the proposed amendment:
"Sec. 6. Marriage.
Marriage between one man and one woman is the only domestic legal
union that shall be valid or recognized in this State. This section
does not prohibit a private party from entering into contracts with
another private party; nor does this section prohibit courts from
adjudicating the rights of private parties pursuant to such contracts." Doesn't something about that seem fishy to you? Take a look at that second sentence. Notice the first sentence does nothing but prohibit a private party from entering into a contract with another private party? I almost don't even want to criticize the legislators on this one. I really don't. It's a well-established fact we've apparently got nothing but idiots running the government. This is one of the few issues the left and the right can seem to agree on. Let's take a second and focus on the big bag of dicks that actually voted this into law. As much as I wanted to believe that Amendment One wouldn't pass, a few people have brought up a good point-- did we really expect more than that out of the South? Yes, I had higher hopes that this state wasn't as ass-backwards as people make it out to be. There are a lot of great things about North Carolina-- the first public university, the Appalachian Mountains, the outer banks, Krispy Kreme, and of course, Appalachian State University. This just shows that there's still a lot of work to be done. While part of me is very angry that this passed, part of me knows that I will live to see it overturned. And I feel confident that one day, my children will look at this chapter in history the same way people my age look at our elders about the civil rights movement. |
Sunday, May 6, 2012
Mad Men: On Betty Draper
I'm working my way through Mad Men, and so far, I really like what I see. The setting is awesome, but what's really kept me watching are the characters. I think they're very deep, complex, well-written, and flawed. And there are characters I love, like Joan and Megan. There are ones I loathe, but does anyone actually LIKE Pete Campbell? And there are some I find myself oddly indifferent towards (Peggy). I told myself I would get completely caught up on the series before I wrote anything about any of the characters. I mean, I at least like to get to know someone before I completely assassinate their character in the written word. Just ask my ex-boyfriends! (GUYS THIS IS A JOKE)
I think Betty Draper (or Francis, whatever) is exempt from this rule. Her role in the series diminishes significantly, and I wouldn't be surprised if she's completely written out by the end of this current season. Betty is interesting and complex, she just isn't very likeable. At all.
In the first season, Don comments that being married to Betty is "being married to a little girl." It isn't a very nice thing to say, but Don isn't exactly known for saying nice things, and he has a point. Betty isn't at all mature emotionally. I really don't want to call her a bad mother, because I say this with decades of progress in parenting influencing my call, but slapping your daughter in the face, locking her in the closet, and letting her play around with a bag over her head seems like a series of bad calls that sort of defines Betty's character.
Betty's emotional immaturity stems from her having been taken care of her whole life. First by her parents, then by Don, then by Henry. When she did work, she was a model. Her job was to stand around and look pretty. Betty has spent her whole life being told what to do and never really having to make a decision for herself. There's part of me that feels sorry for her. After all, she's a housewife in the 1960s. She's stuck in a marriage with a man who cheats on her, and at first I found her almost Feminine-Mystique-esque. Now... now not so much.
We see a HUGE transformation in Betty by season 2. She's gone from bored, tragic housewife to insufferable bitch. The other characters, all of whom are hugely flawed, at least have some redeeming qualities. Betty loses these. I mean, if there was a gun to my head and I had to try to figure out one of Pete's good qualities, I'm sure I could.
Betty is what I expected upper-middle-class, white women to be in her time. The model wife for a man like Don Draper. The definition of a trophy wife. And we start to see how unfulfilled she is. She was obviously raised with the mindset that if you can land a good (or at least rich) man, your life will be easy. Nowhere in there did it say you'd be happy. And in this sense, I feel sorry for Betty. Yes, she's emotionally stunted, but she's also treated like a child by pretty much everyone around her.
One thing I find particularly fascinating is the relationship with Betty and her mother, and then the relationship between Betty and Sally. At the beginning of season 1, we learn that Betty's mother died three months prior to the first episode. We never really see her grieving, but we get some insight into how Betty was raised. Her entire self-worth is placed on her image. Her mother says and does downright cruel things to her, and Betty is the good daughter and lets it happen. Her mother was probably just like her. And when we see her try to apply the same treatment to Sally, Sally rebels. This isn't something Betty is prepared to handle.
I think we're already beginning to see the beginning of the Betty Breakdown. We've established that the one thing Betty values most in the world is the way she looks. And how do you break a WASPy, ice-queen down? Make her fat.
Betty's dissatisfaction with herself and everything is starting to manifest, and I'm anxious to see what the writers are going to do with her.
I think Betty Draper (or Francis, whatever) is exempt from this rule. Her role in the series diminishes significantly, and I wouldn't be surprised if she's completely written out by the end of this current season. Betty is interesting and complex, she just isn't very likeable. At all.
In the first season, Don comments that being married to Betty is "being married to a little girl." It isn't a very nice thing to say, but Don isn't exactly known for saying nice things, and he has a point. Betty isn't at all mature emotionally. I really don't want to call her a bad mother, because I say this with decades of progress in parenting influencing my call, but slapping your daughter in the face, locking her in the closet, and letting her play around with a bag over her head seems like a series of bad calls that sort of defines Betty's character.
Betty's emotional immaturity stems from her having been taken care of her whole life. First by her parents, then by Don, then by Henry. When she did work, she was a model. Her job was to stand around and look pretty. Betty has spent her whole life being told what to do and never really having to make a decision for herself. There's part of me that feels sorry for her. After all, she's a housewife in the 1960s. She's stuck in a marriage with a man who cheats on her, and at first I found her almost Feminine-Mystique-esque. Now... now not so much.
We see a HUGE transformation in Betty by season 2. She's gone from bored, tragic housewife to insufferable bitch. The other characters, all of whom are hugely flawed, at least have some redeeming qualities. Betty loses these. I mean, if there was a gun to my head and I had to try to figure out one of Pete's good qualities, I'm sure I could.
Betty is what I expected upper-middle-class, white women to be in her time. The model wife for a man like Don Draper. The definition of a trophy wife. And we start to see how unfulfilled she is. She was obviously raised with the mindset that if you can land a good (or at least rich) man, your life will be easy. Nowhere in there did it say you'd be happy. And in this sense, I feel sorry for Betty. Yes, she's emotionally stunted, but she's also treated like a child by pretty much everyone around her.
One thing I find particularly fascinating is the relationship with Betty and her mother, and then the relationship between Betty and Sally. At the beginning of season 1, we learn that Betty's mother died three months prior to the first episode. We never really see her grieving, but we get some insight into how Betty was raised. Her entire self-worth is placed on her image. Her mother says and does downright cruel things to her, and Betty is the good daughter and lets it happen. Her mother was probably just like her. And when we see her try to apply the same treatment to Sally, Sally rebels. This isn't something Betty is prepared to handle.
I think we're already beginning to see the beginning of the Betty Breakdown. We've established that the one thing Betty values most in the world is the way she looks. And how do you break a WASPy, ice-queen down? Make her fat.
Betty's dissatisfaction with herself and everything is starting to manifest, and I'm anxious to see what the writers are going to do with her.
Friday, May 4, 2012
Early thoughts on law school...
THERE IS A MAD MEN POST COMING SOON I PROMISE.
How I Want My Classmates to See Me:
How They Will Probably See Me:
How I Want My Classmates to See Me:
How They Will Probably See Me:
Thursday, April 26, 2012
Ms. Gardzalla reviews a book, pt. 1
In college, I majored in English. I loved it, even if it isn't making my current job search any easier. Since one of my few marketable skills is reading the shit out of some books, I figured I'd give reviewing them a try.
Several weeks ago, I was stuck in Union Station for eight hours waiting on a train. Luckily, there was a Barnes and Nobles there, meaning I could keep myself entertained. My Facebook news feed had recently been devoured by posts about The Hunger Games movie, so I thought there wouldn't be any harm in giving the book a go.
BASICS:
The Hunger Games is a 2008 young adult novel by Suzanne Collins. Many hipster douches are quick to point out that the novel/movie is a "ripoff" of the 2000 Japanese film "Battle Royale." They do this in hopes of sounding cultured and smart, but since they didn't point this out four years ago, I'm forced to conclude these people just don't read books.
Anyway, the basic plot of The Hunger Games is that in a futuristic, post-apocalyptic nation known as "Panem," children are annually selected to compete in The Hunger Games, which is a televised fight to the death. The protagonist, a sixteen-year-old girl named Katniss, volunteers in place of her younger sister Prim, surely sealing her own fate. *SPOILERS* OKAY LET'S IGNORE THAT FOR THE ENTIRE BOOK IT'S PRETTY MUCH IMPLIED KATNISS WINS *END SPOILERS*
Overall, I enjoyed the book. It was an entertaining, captivating read, and it certainly made the eight hour wait and seven hour train ride go by much quicker. A lot of people out there are (wrongfully) comparing the book to Twilight. Having read both series, I really don't see that. The main focus of Twilight was the romance between Bella and Edward, and eventually the series came to focus on the love triangle between Bella, Edward, and Jacob. While there is romantic tension in The Hunger Games, it's hardly the focus, and the triangle between Gale, Peeta, and Katniss has been seriously overplayed by idiots. In fact, one of the reasons why I liked Katniss so much as a protagonist is that she doesn't seem to get bogged down by typical teenage crap. Given if I were in an arena with twenty-some-odd people who were trying to kill me, I probably wouldn't be worried what the cute guy in my science class was doing either, but then again, that's just me.
It's a sizeable length book-- three hundred some pages, split into three parts. But it doesn't feel nearly that long. Every chapter ends on a cliffhanger of sorts, so I found myself stopping in the middle of chapters when I needed to take a break, go to work, or go to sleep. After I finished the first book, I decided I liked it enough to read the two sequels. I bought the sequels, even though they're only available in hardcover, which is something I almost never do. And while it might not be a grand literary masterpiece, it's certainly entertaining as hell, and that counts for something. I'd definitely recommend it to anyone.
OVERALL I'd give it four out of five.
Several weeks ago, I was stuck in Union Station for eight hours waiting on a train. Luckily, there was a Barnes and Nobles there, meaning I could keep myself entertained. My Facebook news feed had recently been devoured by posts about The Hunger Games movie, so I thought there wouldn't be any harm in giving the book a go.
BASICS:
The Hunger Games is a 2008 young adult novel by Suzanne Collins. Many hipster douches are quick to point out that the novel/movie is a "ripoff" of the 2000 Japanese film "Battle Royale." They do this in hopes of sounding cultured and smart, but since they didn't point this out four years ago, I'm forced to conclude these people just don't read books.
Anyway, the basic plot of The Hunger Games is that in a futuristic, post-apocalyptic nation known as "Panem," children are annually selected to compete in The Hunger Games, which is a televised fight to the death. The protagonist, a sixteen-year-old girl named Katniss, volunteers in place of her younger sister Prim, surely sealing her own fate. *SPOILERS* OKAY LET'S IGNORE THAT FOR THE ENTIRE BOOK IT'S PRETTY MUCH IMPLIED KATNISS WINS *END SPOILERS*
Overall, I enjoyed the book. It was an entertaining, captivating read, and it certainly made the eight hour wait and seven hour train ride go by much quicker. A lot of people out there are (wrongfully) comparing the book to Twilight. Having read both series, I really don't see that. The main focus of Twilight was the romance between Bella and Edward, and eventually the series came to focus on the love triangle between Bella, Edward, and Jacob. While there is romantic tension in The Hunger Games, it's hardly the focus, and the triangle between Gale, Peeta, and Katniss has been seriously overplayed by idiots. In fact, one of the reasons why I liked Katniss so much as a protagonist is that she doesn't seem to get bogged down by typical teenage crap. Given if I were in an arena with twenty-some-odd people who were trying to kill me, I probably wouldn't be worried what the cute guy in my science class was doing either, but then again, that's just me.
It's a sizeable length book-- three hundred some pages, split into three parts. But it doesn't feel nearly that long. Every chapter ends on a cliffhanger of sorts, so I found myself stopping in the middle of chapters when I needed to take a break, go to work, or go to sleep. After I finished the first book, I decided I liked it enough to read the two sequels. I bought the sequels, even though they're only available in hardcover, which is something I almost never do. And while it might not be a grand literary masterpiece, it's certainly entertaining as hell, and that counts for something. I'd definitely recommend it to anyone.
OVERALL I'd give it four out of five.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)